My Definition of creative now fiction
CNF: Encapsulating the pure truth on the page, by means of the most pressing details from the miniscule thought to the massive overview.
I believe the two writers mixed together might explain my definition. Lopate wrote that you must make yourself into a character and behave believably but I feel as if your character of self should not have to behave believable. If it isn’t real then it is not real and is not creative non-fiction. Perhaps you need to find your pattern or rhythm that you reach your most interesting self. If you have an interesting enough view of self then you are ready to be read by others.
You must have the writing skills and then the abilities to move the thought to the paper in the way the words drop in a fantastic verbal explanation or story. It is a way of expressing the root of the story as if you were addressing an audience in the same manner as a very close associate or friend.
With Kiddler I agree to the level of truth pushed for here, but I do not agree with the actual name’s being used, then it becomes unfair, biased, sneaking, reporting or an unauthorized biography. To tell a real or true story that might be taboo, or private or flattering for some and unflattering for others in the same story.
Then it must have that wonderful feeling of being a person or friend that I quote unquote “Know”. The interesting story everyone pass on to each other naturally. The exposed truth is an expose and the creative non-fiction is the truth you tell your best friends, family inner circle and repeat as cocktail conversation with even one more or less depth and removal and or distance added in. from the original names, a synopsis version and then down to a comment or inside joke or memory of an exceptional moment of distinction.
All in all the like the abilities to tell great stories the same way id would tell them verbally without the constraints of formula. ßDefinition number 2
No comments:
Post a Comment